Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brian Kelsall's avatar

Great input into how you go about your business boys ⚽️👏

East Angles's avatar

This is brilliant. And this is not a recommendation, more a question to you that maybe you can approach in a future DAG. all the data. so much data. But how do you cut through something like West Brom 0 Norwich 5, where Norwich lost the XG, the possession stats, West Brom had more shots, more corners, similar amount of touches in opposition box... usually the response to this is "well, Norwich ran hot and it's not sustainable" but apart from a 15 minute period before half time Norwich were so dominant that actually it wasn't a surprise they won so convincingly (although it was a surprise because Norwich are never so clinical!).

I love the Not The Top Tables and they broadly have been such a good indicator of the Clement factor as we're now in mid-table in them - but in this instance I guess they'd dip the five match grouping down for Norwich when anyone who watches them can see that they're so much better in both boxes.

Guess you just have to say this is a one-off but is it still a reminder that you also need the eye test? Fascinated to understand how you approach the outliers (like Hull!) basically.

No posts

Ready for more?